您现在的位置:首页 > SAT/ACT

新SAT写作OG范文赏析

  • 时间:2016-08-26

  • 来源:互联网

推荐访问:

你的同学在这里:

  • ●(1小时前) 陕西的X同学使用了留学监理网服务:查询中介口碑 预约中介顾问
  • ●(2小时前) 山西的X同学使用了留学监理网服务:推荐留学中介
  • ●(2小时前) 内蒙古的X同学使用了留学监理网服务:预约中介顾问 留学监理服务
  • ●(3小时前) 江苏的X同学使用了留学监理网服务:留学监理服务
  • ●(3小时前) 河南的X同学使用了留学监理网服务:查询中介口碑
  • ●(3小时前) 新疆的X同学使用了留学监理网服务:留学监理服务
  • ●(3小时前) 山东的X同学使用了留学监理网服务:查询中介口碑 推荐留学中介 留学监理服务
  • ●(5小时前) 吉林的X同学使用了留学监理网服务:留学监理服务
  • ●(8小时前) 新疆的X同学使用了留学监理网服务:留学监理服务
  • ●(8小时前) 重庆的X同学使用了留学监理网服务:预约中介顾问 推荐留学中介 留学监理服务
  • ●(12小时前) 吉林的X同学使用了留学监理网服务:查询中介口碑 推荐留学中介 留学监理服务
  • ●(12小时前) 湖南的X同学使用了留学监理网服务:留学监理服务
  • ●(12小时前) 辽宁的X同学使用了留学监理网服务:预约中介顾问 推荐留学中介 留学监理服务
  • ●(12小时前) 江苏的X同学使用了留学监理网服务:推荐留学中介 留学监理服务
  • ●(1天前) 上海的X同学使用了留学监理网服务:留学监理服务
  • ●(1天前) 内蒙古的X同学使用了留学监理网服务:查询中介口碑 留学监理服务
  • ●(1天前) 黑龙江的X同学使用了留学监理网服务:预约中介顾问
  • ●(1天前) 贵州的X同学使用了留学监理网服务:查询中介口碑 预约中介顾问 留学监理服务
  • ●(1天前) 河南的X同学使用了留学监理网服务:推荐留学中介
  • ●(1天前) 海南的X同学使用了留学监理网服务:留学监理服务
去看看 >

请在下方选择您想领取的材料,可多选哦~

限量免费获取
为了帮助大家更好地备考SAT,这里为大家介绍新SAT官方指南OG第三篇练习的范文赏析,本篇的阅读文章讲述的是儿童从小接触科技电子产品的好处,此文曾发表在《时代周刊》上。下面就跟着留学监理网的老师一起来看一下吧

为了帮助大家更好地备考SAT,这里为大家介绍新SAT官方指南OG第三篇练习的范文赏析,本篇的阅读文章讲述的是儿童从小接触科技电子产品的好处,此文曾发表在《时代周刊》上。下面就跟着留学监理网的老师一起来看一下吧

1471922066854880.jpg

材料:The Official SAT Study Guide

题目:The Digital Parent Trap

范文:

In "The Digital Parent Trap", Eliana Dockterman argues that there are benefits to early exposure to technology. Dockterman lays the foundation for her argument by discussing the controversy surrounding the widespread use of technology without clearing stating her own opinion. Once she reveals her position, she builds her case by citing credible experts on the benefits of early technology exposure and debunking the claims of technology detractors.

Although Dockterman spends more than a third of her article exploring possible reasons why broad technology access may not be in the best interests of children, rhetorical questions and clever wording hint that she is not fully on board with technological dissidents. At the start of paragraph three, she pits moms trying to "protect" their kids from technology against dads encouraging them to "embrace it". This forces the reader to start considering the possible pros and cons of early technology exposure. Even as she describes the longstanding reasons why some oppose excessive technology use, careful word choice suggests that opponents of technology are anachronistic and overly rigid in their thinking. At the beginning of paragraph four, the capital letters in the line "For years, the Parental Adage was simple" are a subtle condemnation of overly simplistic thinking. Again, in paragraph five, the phrase "fundamental aversion" suggests that those with a knee-jerk distaste for technology are guilty of fundamentalism.

With the reader beginning to question whether fearmongering over youth technology use is unfounded, Dockterman begins citing expert after expert on the benefits of technology on young minds. All of the experts come from well-respected institutions and quote impressive statistics. A professor of anthropology describes how social networking gives kids access to new forms of learning. Researchers at SRI, "a nonprofit research firm", explain that online games increase students' performance on logic tests. Studies referenced by MIT demonstrate that digital learning dramatically increases information retention compared to more traditional methods of learning like reading, listening, and watching demonstrations. Most important of all, technological fluency gives students a competitive advantage in securing lucrative jobs as the STEM fields continue to grow at a rapid pace. All of these benefits form a firm buffer against the unproven concerns of technology opponents.

Dockterman not only quotes those who oppose technology to make her argument appear more balanced, but she also cleverly uses them to undermine their own cause. Unlike the advocates of technology, the opponents of technology do not cite any statistics nor do they come from comparably impressive backgrounds. This makes the anecdotal testimony of a Waldorf School administrator, for example, pale in comparison with the study conducted by a UC Irvine anthropologist. Even the screen time limits suggested by the American Academy of Pediatrics have become outdated because they wrongly presuppose that all screen time is as mind numbing as watching television. On the contrary, actively using a computer or tablet can be "brain-stimulating".

By first acknowledging why some oppose extensive technology use, Eliana Dockterman sets herself up to effectively tout its social and pedagogical benefits. She concludes her essay with this same nuanced logic she began with by reminding parents that despite technology's many benefits, they are still responsible for monitoring their children's technology time and preventing misuse.


赏析:

下面分别从新SAT文章写作的三个评分要点:reading,analysis和writing,总结满分作文的优点,并结合官方指南样题The Digital Parent Trap的范文来加以具体分析。同时总结开头段落常用句型。

第一、 从阅读方面来看,对原文全面理解,精准掌握中心思想,有以下三个特点:

1、 中心思想,正确诠释。在The Digital Parent Trap的范文中,作者在首段和尾端简要地总结了原文的中心思想:There are benefits to early exposure to technology; Eliana Dockerman sets herself up to effectively tout its social and pedagogical benefits.

2、引用原文,融会贯通。满分文章的一个优点就是会大量自然地呈现原文的细节,比如原文作者所列的facts(事实)、statics(数据)、the results of experiments (实验结果)、research(研究)或是作者的personal anecdote(个人轶事)等。但这绝不是长篇大论的直接引用原文细节,而是通过skillful use of paraphrase and direct quotations (巧妙地改写或者是别具匠心地直接引用)。例如,上述范文的第一主体段落就指出了原文作者Eliana Dockerman 在文中使用了生动的用词(clever wording)及修辞手段: she pits mom trying to “protect” their kids from technology against dads encouraging them to “embrace it”.这体现了原文的细节。可以说,这种对细节的呈现和巧妙的引用贯穿于全文的始终。》》考生如何应对新SAT变革

3、引用原文,精确无误。就阅读而言,评判满分文章的另一个重要标准是,在引用时不能歪曲误解原文作者的意思,更不能与原文作者的意思相悖。满分文章在引用和分析原文的论证过程中,往往能够做到与原文作者若合一契。

第二、从分析方面来看,满分文章对原文的分析有效合理。

满分作文在分析原文作者对论据,推理形式及修辞等语言手段的使用时,要分析这些要素在巩固,支撑原文作者观点中多发挥的作用,借此向考官展示自己的分析能力。比如,在上述范文中,作者不仅简单列出了Eliana Dockerman在原文中所使用的clever wording,而且进一步的分析了这一手法在增强原文说服力上所起的作用:This forces the readers to start considering the possible pros and cons of early technology exposure.

第三、就写作方面而言,满分考生具备极强的英语语言使用和掌握能力,一气呵成,浑然一体。答卷使用了not only...but also, for example, on the contrary等过渡衔接词,使文章结构紧凑,思路清晰。同时句型多变,用词精确,文体正规,语调客观。At the beginning of paragraph four, the capital letters in the line “For years, the Parental Adage was simple” are a sutble condemnation of overly simplistic thinking.”


以上就是新SAT写作OG范文赏析,供大家参考学习,留学监理网祝大家取得好成绩!


大家可以关注我们的高端托福备考公众号—托福考试中心,获取更多的考试资讯。

tf托福考试中心.jpg

大家可以关注我们的“朝九晚五话留学”微信公众号,以获取更多关于留学、考试以及海外咨讯的信息。

hlx话留学.jpg



免费留学咨询申请表(免费推荐留学中介/审核留学方案/获取权威留学资料等)

留学监理网不是留学中介,作为监督平台,5年以上工作经验的留学监理师能给你最客观公正的建议,帮你辨别留学中介为你提供的咨询信息。

*姓名:

*电话:

*邮箱:

QQ:

微信:

你希望:

*留学意向:

*出国就读:

*出国时间:

中教安学•留学监理网祝你申请成功,留学顺利

(特别申明:本站除原创图片外,其他图片来源于网络,版权归作者所有,如有侵权,请联系我们删除。)

找留学中介?先问留学监理网
不走弯路,更有保障

4000-315-285

自己选择留学中介,可能遇到以下问题:
  陷阱合同 霸王条款
  推脱责任 不断拖延
  无端承诺 胡乱收费
  申请失败 拖延退费

我们帮你规避风险,免费推荐留学机构/项目:
  监理师一对一科学分析 定向推荐
  预约高水平的专业顾问 拒绝随机
  审查中介所供留学方案 保障安全
  审核留学中介合同,规避陷阱

请帮我推荐留学中介

或进入个人中心申请

留学志愿参考系统

跟我差不多情况的学长们都申请去了哪里?输入自身情况,真实案例比对,助你快速留学定位。流程:注册/登录>输入自身情况>留学方案定位

自身最高学历

就读院校类型

平均绩点成绩

语言成绩:

中教安学•留学监理网祝你申请成功,留学顺利

最新文章

免费获取留学方案

中教安学旗下留学监理网不是留学中介,所以能给你最客观的建议。5年以上经验的留学监理师,10年大量真实案例,留学方案值得你参考。

中教安学•留学监理网祝你申请成功,留学顺利

登陆成功,欢迎使用留学监理网!